Wednesday, October 26, 2016

Ancor of souls.

Re viewing the soul idea , we will see that it is dictated by two opposing views , a free agent and will and a predetermined world, supposed by science. Now it cannot be simply be free will because one can move their hand , this could be an illusion, yet determinism requires parts reacting that somehow lead to an awareness , which seems impossible since a rock does not contain any awareness at all and neither does the brain itself. Unless you place one their yourself. Yet both are formed from the same substance that can be manipulated into various forms. This would mean that we should have a will that is free but no awareness.

This is impossible because we are seemingly aware but also constrained to the parts at hand. Yet still free to choose from those constants that evolve in time. Therefore if we are aware we are required to have a soul or free agent because because matter as we know is now seemingly incapable of it on its own , without the part of mind which allows for it , either essentially rocks in infinite regress or a unseen part , the soul or Ancor.

Our minds are free but cannot not be physical because they need to have connection with the physical, but it is also evidently not in physical reality either. So this Ancor must be in both at once, a bubble within two forms. A bridge between physical (P) and mental (M), completing parts of either kind. Physical reality is what is outside us and see while mental parts are the thoughts and memories we have when we perceive and live in P, However M is all thought patterns across the whole of P.

But this Ancor is complex in itself because it functions by its parts: I, Selection(s), Modules(m) and Essence(e).

The I is likely the most important aspect of the Ancor, since it is the I that is both physical and mental due to the requirement of such a thing within our minds in reference to earlier paragraphs. It is also this aspect that operates choice,

This is done through selection between modules external and the essence beyond, through the comparison of the essential desire and modules manifest in P#M. Meaning if e=m1 then I#s=m1. If e does not = m2 then I#s will not either. Because I#s#m(all) = e. The I selects what it desires from what it is in e. A baby lacks many modules so is ignorant of its own essence until it begins selections through aging and time.

Modules ( m ) are quite simple, relating to what one has in body (necessary) and what it adds or wears through time, they are dictated by the e but also incorporate m into its essence. Modules can be changed and this modifies the essence. Their are many modules in P#M yet not all are as essential, the module chair means nothing but the module: liking chairs may have higher effect on e. This does not mean anything more than the defining of one's person and who they are through e. Each e#I has a different set of m>m , what is more important is m#c or m's total effect and causes. The e may have obtained a liking for the color red (m#e) and so wears red (m), others react to this through their m's since their e is difficult to perceive completely, but can be conceived through its numerous m.

e functions through its appearance in a person or thing, a stone has an e, but no I so they are separate. but since a man contains an I they can modify their e , this is done through imprints upon it , a hole that is filled with the tiniest aspect of every m selected. unified under one singular point, as each large m passes by the e it absorbs an essential portion , forming a tiny real, yet artificial imitation of the larger aspect only held in place by the I. The form of that specific object or in this case person, the difference being that the I keeps its total aspect ( perception, thought) within its e. This is best described through the equation :
e= i+total(m)

e is capable of crossing P through M , meaning e can be contained in both another person through an m or through an m alone such as a book. This is the impressive force of the essence on M#P, meaning once an e impresses on M#P it is difficult to remove, in any case, good examples would be Plato's republic or Newtons law of gravity, both being the essence of Plato and Newton respectively, still since it only manifests physically through an m it must pass through I to become part of the e of another.

In life the E functions through a subtle link between itself and I but interacts through a force by proximity, it will have little effect if it is not close but will if it is. The I is linked with its modules and so the E is subtle and overcome by its larger P#M. But in death the I snaps back to E and detaches from m because m can no longer sustain its functions as a vessel for I#e, but I#e still has minute effect being still physical, this manifests as the Causam for the e#i and the decomposition/ funeral ceremony dictated by the e still present among the people in M#P.

No comments:

Post a Comment