Previously I've provided a small example of parrelel worlds created using parsemy which is found on several of the blogs in varied level of progress that lets you generate other worlds of interpretation of what you actually define as physical and collapse the reality to in sense of your interpretation opinion that is equally the interpretation collapse of an individual reality which every single type of creative difference creates another viewed nature of what life actually is.
Which by actually describing and matching to the world around you in the sense of actually collapsing the model you made to an existent part of reality that matches the definition of the actual reality you collapse to, which can always be believed or not believed but have real consequence on how you model the world and connect its portions which behave exactly as the matched model you define actually appears.
Which can construct real destinctions of observation based entirely on personal ideas and opinions and what the part of reality they end up studying for thinking that way actually produces by how they interpret its connections they form.
Which builds physics of modelled behavior distinct which in each individual selection of behavior name and what its about, shape different realities of meaning, that represent their difference of opinion that individually produce different things based on which individual produces what that can add aditional knowledge to someone elses whole by research.
Which every distinct opinion does similar or different depending on the model of itself and what the language describes, which individually crafts different models that can be used for different things.
These destinctions are entirely formed within the human mind as models of the world which are matched with the outside world's actual physicalities or added with protophorms where either exist simultanuously as what you know and also end up defining with the difference what actually makes the difference by the word difference that connects those parts that can equally be translated to other opinions as slightly different words that actually end up being used differently by different words that sculpt individual interpretations of the reality as different things that allow slightly different effects.
But none of them are actually good or evil unless one chooses to abuse them for such with resulting consequences for doing either one, although naturally thats because naturally their are no rules to what nature makes as something that doesn't know itself but that is interpreted by something that does know itself and which modelling the world in individually distinct ways irrelevant of the word combination, style and use actually end up being can still be reviewed by others to form reversals or other things from that vary in great degrees of diversity based on personally interpreted differences.
Which are actually entirely dependent on what you select to study to produce something distinct. Which varies in enormous ways but can typically help with anything for individual differences that by being different parts of the whole matter operate in other ways which causes them to do different things, so by using different interpretations you end up with parrelel worlds of actual effect, which can individually render distinct technology based on how those physics are interpreted. But they can translate in varied distinct ways based on normal used language or other interpretation of their differences. Which interact based off how those opposite or different physics actually interact between them as distinctions of word matched with physical reality that equally stands for connections of observed collapse of matter.
Researching these in the themes of what you defined it as leads down paths that actually open up stylistic differentiation of actual concepts, which build up as seperate useful sciences or magics.
These distinct typings can diversify over time by continued focus or single individuals use which causes the concept to vary in style of real world based on popularity and actual effort to build somehow.
These interpretations are not fake or real but actualy existent differences of opinion and application of it. So the argument isn't whether they are real or false but how they as physics actually effect you, without actually having to be the mindset of view the person actually has that may vary in art style.
No comments:
Post a Comment